THE INCLUSIVITY AND EXCLUSIVITY OF TRUE CHRISTIANITY

The gospel is for everyone. All sinners are welcome; the liars, the thieves, the whoremongers, the prostitutes, the murderers, the homosexuals, the drunkards, and the drug addicts. The poor, the downtrodden, the broken-hearted, the outcast, and the rejects of society are all welcome.

The gospel is also for the sweet and the nice who are full of inward vice. And let’s not forget the self righteous religious citizen, who outwardly appear beautiful, but inwardly are dead in their trespasses and sins – they, too need salvation. The gospel is also for the professional people such as doctors, lawyers, and successful business people who seem to have it all together, but are inwardly full of dead men’s bones.

The gospel of Jesus Christ excludes no one and puts the highest value on humanity than any other religion ever known to mankind.

But once a sinner is saved and becomes a member of the body of Christ in a local church, the fellowship is no longer all inclusive. There was a certain standard established by the early apostles to remain a part of the Christian fellowship. Anyone practicing a lifestyle of sin was to be avoided and rejected, but only after relational steps had been taken in an attempt to bring them to repentance and restoration.

Immoral persons were not permitted in the fellowship (1 Cor. 5:9). Nor were those who were unruly and walked disorderly (2 Thes. 3:6). Domineering and sectarian leaders were excluded (3 John 9-11). Those who defiled their separation from the world were excommunicated (Rev. 3:15-16). Fellowship was also based on believing and receiving the doctrine of Christ (2 John 9-11).

Today this sort of divine discipline is clearly missing from church practice. Many don’t understand the ramifications of its neglect or how to employ it. Yet in the early days of the church it was used to preserve the purity and unity of the body of Christ. It was enforced only by authorized persons and a church filled with the love of God who had a single eye toward the glory of God. Also, it was only exercised when other means had been exhausted, and such cases were rare.

Nevertheless, beginning with the first case of divine discipline in the book of Acts we see a great fear coming on the church that brought a halt to any such sinful behavior or serious misconduct in the church (Acts 5:1-11). When believers recognize the supernatural element in divine authority they will not be so reckless and irresponsible in their behavior. Granted, the number of cases where this sort of divine judgment was exercised were small, but it was used as a means to purify the church and preserve its unity.

Believers who would hastily pronounce divine judgment on others should be warned against the danger of using any gift of God for vengeance or vindication. Unfair or unjust discipline that is applied for selfish reasons is contrary to the will of God and will not work. The church is  imperfect and there will always be immaturity and carnality manifested among the saints. However, when a serious situation arises that threatens the purity and unity of the church immmediate action should be taken.

“Assuredly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven. (Mat 18:18)

In such serious cases as the man in 1 Cor. 5 who was committing incest with his stepmother, or the two men, Hymenaeus and Philetus, who denied the resurrection and were overthrowing the faith of some (2 Tim. 2:17-18), God has given the church supernatural authority to bind and loose and keep the church free of desecration.

Could the absence of this type of divine discipline in the Church today be the reason  she is so divided and defiled, and commands so little respect from the world? Could the reason this discipline is not being applied when necessary be also due to the shortage of godly, mature leadership in the church?

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “THE INCLUSIVITY AND EXCLUSIVITY OF TRUE CHRISTIANITY

  1. I think it is probably true the lack of divine discipline accounts for much on going within the body.. However the other question… What is the issue with leadership that there isn’t that kind of Holy living out of which godly discipline can be administered? If one isn’t discipled and isn’t discipling.. The Father’s heart probably isn’t present to administer such oversight. For that to come forth in the Body, I suspect a whole lot of repentance is needed to clean things up so tag e humility needed will be present rather than some of the stuff we’ve seen in the last fifty years.

    • I couldn’t agree with you more. The other thing is that we’ve not seen the example of divine discipline and it’s difficult to follow something you’ve never seen exercised – even though it’s in the Word.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s